Re: [V9fs-developer] Current 9P patches - test branch

[Andrew M. <ak...@li...>]

On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 03:48:35 +0200 Dominique Martinet <asm...@co...> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote on Fri, Jul 13, 2018:
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:13:21 +0200 Dominique Martinet <asm...@co...> wrote:
> > > I've gathered the currently submitted 9P patches that have reached
> > > agreement and will keep this branch up to date:
> > > 
> > >     git://github.com/martinetd/linux 9p-next
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >  - This is based on v4.18-rc4 with a couple of unrelated patches (an
> > > i915 compiler warning-treated-as-error fix and Jun Piao's refcount of
> > > trans_mod fix that I would like to see merged before these; both will be
> > > removed before actual submission)
> > 
> > Please get this into linux-next after the 4.19-rc1 release.  I'll send
> > any leftovers I have over to you once this is done.
> 
> Okay, I will rebase onto 4.19-rc1 and send Stephen a pull request for
> linux-next at that time (and a second one to linus after getting your
> leftovers in + a few days?)
> 
> (I assume the reason to not do that after 4.18 is out is to not
> duplicate any patch you might already have gotten merged for 4.19?)
> 

Well, we're at 4.18-rc5 now.  In 2-3 weeks Linus will release 4.18 then
two weeks after that he'll release 4.19-rc1.

But what the heck - I'll send it all at you right now:

fs-9p-adding-new-return-type-vm_fault_t.patch
net-9p-clientc-add-missing-n-at-the-end-of-p9_debug.patch
9p-net-protocolc-return-enomem-when-kmalloc-failed.patch
net-9p-fix-error-path-of-p9_virtio_probe.patch
9p-fix-spelling-mistake-uknown-unknown.patch
version-pointer-uninitialized.patch

please merge them, ask Stephen to add your tree to linux-next.  When
the above patches turn up in -next I'll autodrop my copies.