John Keiser - 2001-09-03

Logged In: YES
user_id=312414

This bug is now partly fixed ... it turns out the cache was
already getting really big.

Looking at the size of the cache in Mason, it looks like
it's still a lot larger than it should be ... perhaps Mason
serialization makes things bigger than they need to be. (I
have checked the value before it goes in and it's not *that*
big anyway.)