From: Jeff D. <jd...@ka...> - 2002-02-02 03:17:25
|
mal...@t-... said: > I, by pure hazard I think, got it running once. Then I exited with > "halt" and then it never ran again, hanging on the following: > Mounted devfs on /dev INIT: version 2.60 booting EXT2-fs warning: > mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended It's a bug in the version of init in that filesystem that somehow UML recently started exercising. It virtually always hangs for me, although once in a while, it doesn't. I haven't got around to dropping a newer init into it yet. Jeff |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ka...> - 2002-02-04 06:15:45
|
mma...@ya... said: > Actually, this perked my curiosity so I checked, and I am able to > recreate this problem with the 1um kernels from both the deb and rpm > packages; Jeff is right, sometimes it works, but for the most part it > doesn't. It's a race. It depends how scheduling happens immediately after a fork. Jeff |
From: Jonathan R. <mma...@ya...> - 2002-02-02 04:48:20
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeff Dike wrote: > mal...@t-... said: > > I, by pure hazard I think, got it running once. Then I exited with > > "halt" and then it never ran again, hanging on the following: > > > Mounted devfs on /dev INIT: version 2.60 booting EXT2-fs warning: > > mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended > > It's a bug in the version of init in that filesystem that somehow UML recently > started exercising. That's strange, I can't recreate this problem and I am using 10um: (root_fs_tomrtbt_1.7.205) VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. INIT: version 2.60 booting EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended INIT: Entering runlevel: 5 Welcome to the uml version of Tom's root/boot. > It virtually always hangs for me, although once in a while, it doesn't. > > I haven't got around to dropping a newer init into it yet. Jonathan |
From: Jonathan R. <mma...@ya...> - 2002-02-02 06:00:00
|
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Jonathan Rosenbaum wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > It's a bug in the version of init in that filesystem that somehow UML recently > > started exercising. > > That's strange, I can't recreate this problem and I am using 10um: Actually, this perked my curiosity so I checked, and I am able to recreate this problem with the 1um kernels from both the deb and rpm packages; Jeff is right, sometimes it works, but for the most part it doesn't. You have a few solutions. First, with the 1um kernel add init=/bin/sh along with the devfs=nomount option. This will give you a shell. Now type mount -a, and you will have a rw fs. You can also grab gbootroot from gbootroot.sf.net. There is a kernel included with this package which I have verified to work. If it doesn't work for you, I definitely want to know. > (root_fs_tomrtbt_1.7.205) > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. > INIT: version 2.60 booting > EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended > INIT: Entering runlevel: 5 > > Welcome to the uml version of Tom's root/boot. > > > It virtually always hangs for me, although once in a while, it doesn't. > > > > I haven't got around to dropping a newer init into it yet. > > > Jonathan > > > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-user mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > |