From: Eric B K. <er...@ki...> - 2002-11-09 19:28:14
|
Howdy Folks, Thanks for your replies. Unfortunately the project that I am working on is based on the 2.4.18 kernel so that is what I need to work with. Thanks, Eric -----Original Message----- From: use...@li... [mailto:use...@li...]On Behalf Of Net Llama! Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:09 PM To: Ian Chilton Cc: Eric B Kiser; use...@li... Subject: Re: [uml-user] Recommended UML Utilities release for 2.4.18-53 On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ian Chilton wrote: > Hello, > > > Why not use the latest 2.4.9 kernel, with the latest released UML-utils? > > Before you look confused I think his 1 key didn't work :) Uhhh..yea, that :) > > He ment latest 2.4.19 kernel (-27um) and the latest uml_utilities > (released the other day). yup -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman net...@li... Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user |
From: Eric B K. <er...@ki...> - 2002-11-11 15:35:13
|
Hi David, thanks for responding. I am using UML to run multiple copies of LEAF-Bering1.0-rc4 which has standardized, for the time being, on the 2.4.18 kernel. In my attempt to mimic this environment most accurately I wanted to use the same base kernel that the standard distribution uses. As far as convincing the patches to work with 2.4.19, I have not attempted this for the above reason. >>Or you could backport 2.4.19-28um to 2.4.18. Could you explain what you mean by this or point me in a direction where I research this on my own? Thanks for your assistance, Eric -----Original Message----- From: use...@li... [mailto:use...@li...]On Behalf Of David Coulson Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:30 PM To: Eric B Kiser Cc: use...@li... Subject: Re: [uml-user] Recommended UML Utilities release for 2.4.18-53 Eric B Kiser wrote: > Thanks for your replies. Unfortunately the project that I am working on is > based on the 2.4.18 kernel so that is what I need to work with. What exactly does 'based on the 2.4.18 kernel' mean? Is it impossible to convince the patches to work with 2.4.19 or 2.4.20-rc1? I'd sooner hack a patch to make it work with a recent kernel than try to mess with an ancient UML patch. Or you could backport 2.4.19-28um to 2.4.18. Your choice. David -- David Coulson http://davidcoulson.net/ d...@vi... http://journal.davidcoulson.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user |
From: David C. <da...@da...> - 2002-11-11 15:59:31
|
Eric B Kiser wrote: > Could you explain what you mean by this or point me in a direction where I > research this on my own? Convince 2.4.19-28um to apply to 2.4.18. David -- David Coulson http://davidcoulson.net/ d...@vi... http://journal.davidcoulson.net/ |
From: Eric B K. <er...@ki...> - 2002-11-11 16:15:16
|
Ah, thanks for the explanation! Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: use...@li... [mailto:use...@li...]On Behalf Of David Coulson Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:04 AM To: Eric B Kiser Cc: use...@li... Subject: Re: [uml-user] Recommended UML Utilities release for 2.4.18-53 Eric B Kiser wrote: > Could you explain what you mean by this or point me in a direction where I > research this on my own? Convince 2.4.19-28um to apply to 2.4.18. David -- David Coulson http://davidcoulson.net/ d...@vi... http://journal.davidcoulson.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user |
From: David C. <da...@da...> - 2002-11-10 03:27:41
|
Eric B Kiser wrote: > Thanks for your replies. Unfortunately the project that I am working on is > based on the 2.4.18 kernel so that is what I need to work with. What exactly does 'based on the 2.4.18 kernel' mean? Is it impossible to convince the patches to work with 2.4.19 or 2.4.20-rc1? I'd sooner hack a patch to make it work with a recent kernel than try to mess with an ancient UML patch. Or you could backport 2.4.19-28um to 2.4.18. Your choice. David -- David Coulson http://davidcoulson.net/ d...@vi... http://journal.davidcoulson.net/ |