On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:47:57PM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Toralf Förster <tor...@gm...> wrote:
> > On 03/10/2013 10:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:25:01PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> >> > ?
> >>
> >> It would need to be ported due to the different syscall table.
> >> I wrote aobut this being fairly easy recently:
> >> http://codemonkey.org.uk/2013/03/04/architecture-support-trinity/
> >>
> >> There's also a porting doc in Documentation/
> >
> > Understood.
> >
> > I'm rather a I-bother-devs-with-bug-reports-user than a developer, but
> > I'm Cc:ing the UML user list - maybe there's a volunteer ?
>
> Erm, the UML syscall table is identical to x86(_x64).
> That's why you can run any x86 program within UML...
ah, cool. For some reason I thought there were some uml specific extensions.
I stand corrected.
In which case, it should be good to go.
Dave
|
