From: <sko...@up...> - 2004-08-23 23:00:43
|
Hi, my gentoo-UMLs have the "problem" that they use 100% CPU while shutting down. Does anybody know, why? I have the impression, that it is the init-process that takes so much CPU. Thx Sven |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2004-08-30 23:24:42
|
Alle 01:00, marted=EC 24 agosto 2004, Sven K=F6hler ha scritto: > Hi, > > my gentoo-UMLs have the "problem" that they use 100% CPU while shutting > down. Does anybody know, why? I have the impression, that it is the > init-process that takes so much CPU. No idea about that - there are some issues with Real time clock, though, wh= ich=20 cause UML to use 100% CPU when the host clock goes backward, for instance=20 (solved in 2.4.26-3um). =2D-=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 |
From: Patrick \Petschge\ K. <pet...@we...> - 2004-08-31 13:11:08
|
Hi, > my gentoo-UMLs have the "problem" that they use 100% CPU while shutting > down. Does anybody know, why? I have the impression, that it is the > init-process that takes so much CPU. I have the same problem with 2.6.* uml-kernels on a SuSE 9.1 host. The guest filesysstem is a selfmade system based on busybox. The same host and the same guest filesystem work flawless with 2.4.* uml kernels. I reported the problem to the mailinglist when I found it in a 2.6.0-test?? kernel. The resulting thread has the subject "Shutdown bug" but it offered no solution. HTH, Patrick "Petschge" Kilian |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2004-09-10 02:56:44
|
sko...@up... said: > Does anybody know, why? I have the impression, that it is the > init-process that takes so much CPU. Do you have a filesystem that does this reliably, and can you make available for me to grab it? Jeff |