From: <jur...@pa...> - 2004-06-29 08:57:57
|
Hello, I want to be able to use NFS for accessing files on the hostsystem. For this to work the sunrpc module is necessary, but I tried already several kernels between 2.4.18 and 2.4.26, but they all give the same problem. I can compile the kernel and the modules, but the sunrpc module references two symbols which are unresolved at loading time : __flush_tlb_one and mk_pte. Due to this, I can use my kernel, but NFS is unusable. I have found absolutely no references to this problemon the Internet, which indicates to me that at this moment nobody is using NFS together with UML. I can safely say this because I use pristine kernel source from kernel.org, and patch it only with the UML patch, and then compile. Regards, Jurgen |
From: J. B. F. <bf...@fi...> - 2004-06-29 14:36:25
|
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Jurgen Defurne wrote: > I want to be able to use NFS for accessing files on the hostsystem. For > this to work the sunrpc module is necessary, but I tried already several > kernels between 2.4.18 and 2.4.26, but they all give the same problem. > > I can compile the kernel and the modules, but the sunrpc module > references two symbols which are unresolved at loading time : > __flush_tlb_one and mk_pte. Due to this, I can use my kernel, but NFS is > unusable. > > I have found absolutely no references to this problemon the Internet, > which indicates to me that at this moment nobody is using NFS together > with UML. Well, not necessarily--they could be building in sunrpc. --Bruce Fields |
From: Nix <ni...@es...> - 2004-06-29 15:51:20
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, J. Bruce Fields stipulated: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Jurgen Defurne wrote: [snip] >> I have found absolutely no references to this problemon the Internet, >> which indicates to me that at this moment nobody is using NFS together >> with UML. > > Well, not necessarily--they could be building in sunrpc. Exactly so. (Indeed, for my primary use --- firewalls and internet- facing boxes --- modules would be harmful.) I doubt terribly many people anywhere use modular NFS: it tends to be one of those things that either your site uses, or doesn't, and changes are very rare. -- `We in no way believe that this Christ was a space alien.' --- A creationist website goes completely bonkers |
From: Dan L. <ar...@co...> - 2004-06-29 14:43:19
|
I can safely say that I'm using NFS with UML..... and I'm using kernel 2.4.25, patched and compiled by myself. I don't use modules, that's one of the differences. Try it compiled in. It's a pretty far-fetched idea to think that no one is using NFS together with UML, considering how many people use UML. --Dan Lund Jurgen Defurne wrote: >Hello, > >I want to be able to use NFS for accessing files on the hostsystem. For >this to work the sunrpc module is necessary, but I tried already several >kernels between 2.4.18 and 2.4.26, but they all give the same problem. > >I can compile the kernel and the modules, but the sunrpc module >references two symbols which are unresolved at loading time : >__flush_tlb_one and mk_pte. Due to this, I can use my kernel, but NFS is >unusable. > >I have found absolutely no references to this problemon the Internet, >which indicates to me that at this moment nobody is using NFS together >with UML. > >I can safely say this because I use pristine kernel source from >kernel.org, and patch it only with the UML patch, and then compile. > >Regards, > >Jurgen > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. >Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - >digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, >unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com >_______________________________________________ >User-mode-linux-user mailing list >Use...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > > > ----------- This email message and any attachment may contain Confidential or Protected Health Information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately at 480-648-4545 and delete the message. |
From: <jur...@pa...> - 2004-06-29 20:11:17
|
Ok, thanks for all the responses. I finally found out what the problem was : HIGHMEM support should be set to n, this is what references __flush_tlb_one. I finally got a working NFS setup. Bye, Jurgen |