From: Franck <fr...@li...> - 2004-06-04 13:21:20
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I've a problem with iptables on UML guest. All work fine but when i'm lauch= ing=20 basic iptables script, crash and freeze :( #sh iptables_basic.sh iptables_basic.sh : line 1: 148 Segmentation fault iptables -F My config : =2D - host kernel 2.6.6 with 2 skas patchs =2D - UML kernel 2.4.26 with UML patch all compil with Y no module =2D - Command line to lauch the UML (ip=3D192.168.0.135) =2E/linux-uml-2.4.26-full-in\ umid=3Dbase_woody \ ubd0=3D/home/franck/temp/uml/distribs/base_woody_ext3 \ ubd1=3D/home/franck/temp/uml/cow/arf.com/arf.com-swap \ fakehd fake_ide \ mem=3D64M \ con=3Dnull con0=3Dfd:0,fd:1 \ eth0=3Dtuntap,,,192.168.0.100 \ ubd=3D3 \ root=3D/dev/ubd0 #### basic Iptables ###### iptables -X iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -m state --state INVALID -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT ###################### Regards =2D --=20 =46ranck http://www.linuxpourtous.com =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAwHdI1zwfep5k9qERAiPDAJ9xqTHBXkh7yMwR9bOb5+gsI8iSTgCfXg3s JN74K8oXiK06vvBwenL4INI=3D =3DQBKJ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: <sta...@ti...> - 2004-06-04 13:34:22
|
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 03:21:11PM +0200, Franck wrote: > Hello, > > I've a problem with iptables on UML guest. All work fine but when i'm lauching > basic iptables script, crash and freeze :( Hi. I just hit this and Sven 'Darkman' Michels pointed that there's known bug in 2.4.26-1 patch and I have to apply 2.4.24 patch to 2.4.26 kernel to avoid crash, and also use http://vs165141.v.sectoor.de/uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch to make it compile. And it worked. Good luck! |
From: Franck <fr...@li...> - 2004-06-04 13:44:47
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > I've a problem with iptables on UML guest. All work fine but when i'm > > lauching basic iptables script, crash and freeze :( > > Hi. > > I just hit this and Sven 'Darkman' Michels pointed that there's known bug > in 2.4.26-1 patch and I have to apply 2.4.24 patch to 2.4.26 kernel to > avoid crash, and also use > http://vs165141.v.sectoor.de/uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch to make it compile. > And it worked. OK, but, must i apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch after= or=20 only uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch ??? apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch =3D error : patch -p1 < ../uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch patching file include/asm-um/system-i386.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n ++ =2D --=20 =46ranck http://www.linuxpourtous.com =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAwHzI1zwfep5k9qERArUDAJ9aBq4jiSsuYBsscBgnH2U7x8qLNACfeLlm wbKpUFtvhHh/KzfvTv+VvJ0=3D =3DxTvV =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: <sta...@ti...> - 2004-06-04 14:03:52
|
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 03:44:40PM +0200, Franck wrote: > OK, but, must i apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch after or No > only uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch ??? No You must apply to linux-2.4.26: 1. uml-patch-2.4.24-1 patch (watch - 24, not 26) AND 2. uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch patch Do not mess the order - big patch goes the first, small after it. Small patch just removes some code. Good luck :) |
From: Sven M. <smi...@se...> - 2004-06-04 14:54:41
|
Franck wrote: > >>>I've a problem with iptables on UML guest. All work fine but when i'm >>>lauching basic iptables script, crash and freeze :( >> >>Hi. >> >>I just hit this and Sven 'Darkman' Michels pointed that there's known bug >>in 2.4.26-1 patch and I have to apply 2.4.24 patch to 2.4.26 kernel to >>avoid crash, and also use >>http://vs165141.v.sectoor.de/uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch to make it compile. >>And it worked. > > > OK, but, must i apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch after or > only uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch ??? > > apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch = error : > patch -p1 < ../uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch > patching file include/asm-um/system-i386.h > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n please, read what i wrote.. use the 2.4.24-um1 (notice the 24) and then my 2.4.26 patch, this is to make uml compile with the 24-um1 patch applied to a 2.4.26 kernel. Regards, Sven |
From: Franck <fr...@li...> - 2004-06-04 16:32:50
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch =3D error : > > patch -p1 < ../uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch > > patching file include/asm-um/system-i386.h > > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n > > please, read what i wrote.. use the 2.4.24-um1 (notice the 24) > and then my 2.4.26 patch, this is to make uml compile with the > 24-um1 patch applied to a 2.4.26 kernel. Sorry, 1 google of sorry :( It's my fault :( ALL work fine, YAHOOOoooooooooo ;) ++ =2D --=20 =46ranck http://www.linuxpourtous.com =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAwKQb1zwfep5k9qERAhZqAJ9uBigxbiA9ttsGCOJ0qtVW8nJm/gCfSPz1 KbiR6+uvQOxJqrPcp1gqQTg=3D =3DQ0h7 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: <sko...@up...> - 2004-06-04 23:50:09
|
>>>apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch = error : >>>patch -p1 < ../uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch >>>patching file include/asm-um/system-i386.h >>>Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n >> >>please, read what i wrote.. use the 2.4.24-um1 (notice the 24) >>and then my 2.4.26 patch, this is to make uml compile with the >>24-um1 patch applied to a 2.4.26 kernel. > > Sorry, 1 google of sorry :( It's my fault :( > ALL work fine, YAHOOOoooooooooo ;) So you just used 2.4.24 instead of 2.6.6? I'd like the BUG in 2.6.6 to be fixed. Does anybody know why 2.4.26 and 2.6.6 crash when using iptables? |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2004-06-05 16:42:58
|
Alle 01:50, sabato 5 giugno 2004, Sven K=F6hler ha scritto: > >>>apply uml-patch-2.4.26-1 AND uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch =3D error : > >>>patch -p1 < ../uml-2.4.26-cmpxchg.patch > >>>patching file include/asm-um/system-i386.h > >>>Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n > >> > >>please, read what i wrote.. use the 2.4.24-um1 (notice the 24) > >>and then my 2.4.26 patch, this is to make uml compile with the > >>24-um1 patch applied to a 2.4.26 kernel. > > > > Sorry, 1 google of sorry :( It's my fault :( > > ALL work fine, YAHOOOoooooooooo ;) > > So you just used 2.4.24 instead of 2.6.6? I'd like the BUG in 2.6.6 to > be fixed. Well, he has a 2.6.6 HOST, and the problem is with 2.4.26 patch. You're the= =20 first to claim that Uml-2.6.6 is buggy - did you observed it or just=20 misunderstood the post (which is a bit misleading, actually)? =2D-=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 |
From: <sko...@up...> - 2004-06-05 16:49:13
|
> Well, he has a 2.6.6 HOST, and the problem is with 2.4.26 patch. You're the > first to claim that Uml-2.6.6 is buggy - did you observed it or just > misunderstood the post (which is a bit misleading, actually)? Damn, i'm a bit over-worked at present and i just misunderstood his post. I haven't tried to use iptables in my 2.6.6 UMLs yet, since the gentoo-ebuild is somewhat broken ... |