From: Erik de B. - L. <Erik@LowVoice.nl> - 2004-05-05 00:33:17
|
Hi List, I get an error while running mkcow: ROOT # uml_mkcow redhat9.disk.cow redhat9.image.server-minimal.disk Couldn't stat "/home/uml/UMLS/rh9/ROOT/redhat9.image.server-minimal.disk" : errno = 75 Couldn't get size of backing file '/home/uml/UMLS/rh9/ROOT/redhat9.image.server-minimal.disk', errno = 1073743336 write_cow_header: Value too large for defined data type (it's the standard RH9 image form mirrors.umlblabla.org) Running uml_mkcow like everyone else gets me an error... I thought it means that the file is too big an that the script can't handle it, but aren't filesystem images always very big? I thought It would support this. I've compiled the usermode-utilities myself, The version 20040406 files are now < 1 month old... gcc compiler options are: -mcpu=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -DTUNTAP -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -g -Wall This seems to be the correct way to compile them, so I'm submitting this! Sorry if I've missed something important, though I can't see it. Kind regards, Met vriendelijke groeten, Erik de Bruijn www.LowVoice.nl |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2004-05-07 16:46:30
|
Erik@LowVoice.nl said: > ROOT # uml_mkcow redhat9.disk.cow redhat9.image.server-minimal.disk > Couldn't stat "/home/uml/UMLS/rh9/ROOT/redhat9.image.server-minimal.disk" > : errno = 75 That sure looks like it wasn't built with large file support. > -mcpu=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -DTUNTAP -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -g -Wall That sure looks like it's building with large file support. Are you sure you're running the mk_cow that you built? Jeff |