From: Jonathan B. <j.m...@sm...> - 2003-11-20 09:39:49
|
Hi Could anyone suggest the best way to get module support working in a 2.6 version of uml ? Is module support working on any version of 2.6-uml ? or shall I just try them all ;) I tried 2.6-test9 but get the same error as this: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3459548&forum_id=3647 Fortunately, on 2003-11-13 23:00 "Milan P. Stanic" <mps@rn...> writes: that's exactly what i did yesterday night. now i have the diffs that make it compile fine. i have not really tested the module loading/unloading thing. once it works, i will send the diffs. or if you are interested, i can send them to you. kind regards anupam If you could send me any diffs it would be much appreciated. Thanks Jonathan |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2003-11-21 02:19:14
|
j.m...@sm... said: > Could anyone suggest the best way to get module support working in a > 2.6 version of uml ? Look at the arch changes needed to support modules in 2.6 and implement them for UML :-) > Is module support working on any version of 2.6-uml ? or shall I just > try them all ;) It doesn't work. I haven't bothered adding the module changes to UML yet. Jeff |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2003-11-22 18:42:43
|
Alle 03:29, venerd=EC 21 novembre 2003, Jeff Dike ha scritto: > j.m...@sm... said: > > Could anyone suggest the best way to get module support working in a > > 2.6 version of uml ? > > Look at the arch changes needed to support modules in 2.6 and implement > them for UML :-) > > > Is module support working on any version of 2.6-uml ? or shall I just > > try them all ;) > > It doesn't work. I haven't bothered adding the module changes to UML yet. There has been a lot of post with about the same patch for module loading(w= ith=20 a lot of proposal, most are about the same one): why did you never reply to= =20 them? Were they all incomplete(which is possible) or you just didn't have=20 time? What I've seen was: 1) define an empty apply_alternatives 2) define some constants inside archparam-i386(stolen from an already exist= ing=20 header for the i386 arch) 3) export some more symbols. =2D-=20 cat <<EOSIGN Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux Kernel 2.4.21/2.6.0-test on an i686; Linux registered user n. 292729 EOSIGN |