From: Peter <pet...@ri...> - 2005-07-30 21:23:02
|
Hi. We tried 2.6.12.3-skas3-v8.2 on a host server. It kernel paniced (could not capture the panic) after about 90 minutes. I'd tried a 2.6.12 skasv8.2 a week or so back on another server and got the same result. 2.6.11.12-skas3-v8.2 has been running fine for 20 odd hours. Has anyone had success with 2.6.12 skas v8.2? If so I'd be interested in a kernel .config. FWIW our hosts are dual xeons. Regards, Peter |
From: Anthony B. <br...@st...> - 2005-07-30 22:37:47
|
Peter, I haven't tried 2.6.12. However, I'm now testing v8.2 with 2.6.13-rc4 on one of our development machines. It's been running for 16 hours without issue. This is a dual Opteron system running a 32-bit kernel. Have you tried a vanilla 2.6.12.3 kernel to determine if the issue is with SKAS? Tony -----Original Message----- From: use...@li... [mailto:use...@li...]On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 2:23 PM To: use...@li... Subject: [uml-devel] skas v8.2 results Hi. We tried 2.6.12.3-skas3-v8.2 on a host server. It kernel paniced (could not capture the panic) after about 90 minutes. I'd tried a 2.6.12 skasv8.2 a week or so back on another server and got the same result. 2.6.11.12-skas3-v8.2 has been running fine for 20 odd hours. Has anyone had success with 2.6.12 skas v8.2? If so I'd be interested in a kernel .config. FWIW our hosts are dual xeons. Regards, Peter ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel |
From: Christopher S. A. <ca...@li...> - 2005-07-30 23:21:18
|
Peter wrote: > Hi. > > We tried 2.6.12.3-skas3-v8.2 on a host server. It kernel paniced (could > not capture the panic) after about 90 minutes. I'd tried a 2.6.12 > skasv8.2 a week or so back on another server and got the same result. I had a similar problem a few weeks back when I attempted to run 2.6.12.1 and skas-2.6.12-rc4-v9-pre4. Crashed within 30 minutes or so, so I reverted back to 2.6.11.11 and skas-v8. I haven't had the time to narrow down the problem. It's on my to-do list for this week. Incidentally, I've had kernel stability problems with the last dozen hosts I've placed online. These machines crash with no console output after a few days to a few weeks uptime. Haven't been able to track it down yet, but my hope is whatever it might be is fixed in more recent kernels. It seems like a hardware or CPU speed and kernel version issue, since the identical kernel runs flawlessly on other, slower hosts. I'll post more details in a few days. -Chris |
From: Blaisorblade <bla...@ya...> - 2005-10-06 19:07:58
|
On Saturday 30 July 2005 23:22, Peter wrote: > Hi. > > We tried 2.6.12.3-skas3-v8.2 on a host server. It kernel paniced (could > not capture the panic) after about 90 minutes. I'd tried a 2.6.12 > skasv8.2 a week or so back on another server and got the same result. > 2.6.11.12-skas3-v8.2 has been running fine for 20 odd hours. > Has anyone had success with 2.6.12 skas v8.2? If so I'd be interested > in a kernel .config. FWIW our hosts are dual xeons. Peter, has anything changed on this issue? Had problems with 2.6.11 or success with 2.6.12/2.6.13? I've not heard any news, plus I've difficulties in imagining what's wrong here. However, I'm going to think a bit more on this, and on an idea I just had. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it |
From: Peter <pet...@ri...> - 2005-10-06 21:28:39
|
Hi. We have not re-tried a skas kernel later than 2.6.11. Regards, Peter Blaisorblade wrote: > On Saturday 30 July 2005 23:22, Peter wrote: > >>Hi. >> >>We tried 2.6.12.3-skas3-v8.2 on a host server. It kernel paniced (could >>not capture the panic) after about 90 minutes. I'd tried a 2.6.12 >>skasv8.2 a week or so back on another server and got the same result. > > >>2.6.11.12-skas3-v8.2 has been running fine for 20 odd hours. > > >>Has anyone had success with 2.6.12 skas v8.2? If so I'd be interested >>in a kernel .config. FWIW our hosts are dual xeons. > > Peter, has anything changed on this issue? Had problems with 2.6.11 or success > with 2.6.12/2.6.13? > > I've not heard any news, plus I've difficulties in imagining what's wrong > here. However, I'm going to think a bit more on this, and on an idea I just > had. |