From: Anton I. <ant...@ko...> - 2018-03-11 18:29:58
|
HI all, Is the list working for everyone? I did not get the last two messages I sent to the list. Nothing in the logs on my side either - they were accepted by sourceforge, but no attempts to send them back. A |
From: Brandeburg, J. <jes...@in...> - 2018-03-12 15:10:57
|
> Is the list working for everyone? I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over the last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. |
From: Anton I. <ant...@ko...> - 2018-03-12 15:22:46
|
On 03/12/18 15:10, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: >> Is the list working for everyone? > I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over the last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. > > Thanks, I will try to pin it down. A couple of mails where I had the list cc-ed for patches never came back to me. I need to check if they show up in the archive. A. |
From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2018-03-12 15:20:14
|
Anton, Jesse, Am Montag, 12. März 2018, 16:10:45 CET schrieb Brandeburg, Jesse: > > Is the list working for everyone? > > I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over the > last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. Hmm, I got this mail only because you CC'ed me. I don't see it in my mailinglist inbox. We should bite the bullet and migrate way from sf.net, finally. Any volunteers? Thanks, //richard |
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2018-03-13 13:24:32
|
Hi Richard, On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Richard Weinberger <ri...@no...> wrote: > Am Montag, 12. März 2018, 16:10:45 CET schrieb Brandeburg, Jesse: >> > Is the list working for everyone? >> >> I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over the >> last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. > > Hmm, I got this mail only because you CC'ed me. I don't see it in my > mailinglist inbox. > > We should bite the bullet and migrate way from sf.net, finally. > Any volunteers? You can ask DaveM to create a list at vger. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li... In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds |
From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2018-03-13 13:59:13
|
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018, 14:24:23 CET schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Richard, > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Richard Weinberger <ri...@no...> wrote: > > Am Montag, 12. März 2018, 16:10:45 CET schrieb Brandeburg, Jesse: > >> > Is the list working for everyone? > >> > >> I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over the > >> last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. > > > > Hmm, I got this mail only because you CC'ed me. I don't see it in my > > mailinglist inbox. > > > > We should bite the bullet and migrate way from sf.net, finally. > > Any volunteers? > > You can ask DaveM to create a list at vger. Yes, or infradead.org. The bigger problem is migrating all users. Maybe there is a way to extract a list of subscribers from lists.sourceforge.net. Jeff made me project admin some time ago, maybe I can exhume that account. Or we are rude and expect everyone to re-subscribe to the new UML list. That way we might lose 99% of all subscribers but at least the 1% is interested in UML for sure. ;-) Thanks, //richard |
From: Anton I. <ant...@ko...> - 2018-03-13 14:05:15
|
On 03/13/18 13:59, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018, 14:24:23 CET schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: >> Hi Richard, >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Richard Weinberger <ri...@no...> wrote: >>> Am Montag, 12. März 2018, 16:10:45 CET schrieb Brandeburg, Jesse: >>>>> Is the list working for everyone? >>>> I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over the >>>> last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. >>> Hmm, I got this mail only because you CC'ed me. I don't see it in my >>> mailinglist inbox. >>> >>> We should bite the bullet and migrate way from sf.net, finally. >>> Any volunteers? >> You can ask DaveM to create a list at vger. > Yes, or infradead.org. > The bigger problem is migrating all users. > > Maybe there is a way to extract a list of subscribers from > lists.sourceforge.net. Jeff made me project admin some time ago, maybe I can > exhume that account. > > Or we are rude and expect everyone to re-subscribe to the new UML list. > That way we might lose 99% of all subscribers but at least the 1% is > interested in UML for sure. ;-) +1 > > Thanks, > //richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-devel mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel > |
From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2018-03-19 14:23:10
|
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018, 14:59:41 CET schrieb Richard Weinberger: > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018, 14:24:23 CET schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Richard Weinberger <ri...@no...> wrote: > > > Am Montag, 12. März 2018, 16:10:45 CET schrieb Brandeburg, Jesse: > > >> > Is the list working for everyone? > > >> > > >> I got this mail... BTW Sourceforge had a major datacenter issue over > > >> the > > >> last few weeks, not sure if that broke something along the way. > > > > > > Hmm, I got this mail only because you CC'ed me. I don't see it in my > > > mailinglist inbox. > > > > > > We should bite the bullet and migrate way from sf.net, finally. > > > Any volunteers? > > > > You can ask DaveM to create a list at vger. > > Yes, or infradead.org. > The bigger problem is migrating all users. > > Maybe there is a way to extract a list of subscribers from > lists.sourceforge.net. Jeff made me project admin some time ago, maybe I can > exhume that account. I checked, migrating is not an option. sourceforge has hacked mailman to hide member mail addresses: "As a result of the latest electronic messaging and privacy requirements around the world, SourceForge has implemented a number of changes that affect email privacy. One part of this is that it is no longer possible for project admins to view the member emails of their mailing lists." > Or we are rude and expect everyone to re-subscribe to the new UML list. > That way we might lose 99% of all subscribers but at least the 1% is > interested in UML for sure. ;-) So, I'll ask for a mailinglist on infradead.org. Thanks, //richard P.s: Just realized that most of my mails also didn't make it to the mailinglist. That _sucks_. |
From: Bernd P. <be...@pe...> - 2018-03-20 02:46:01
|
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: [...] > I checked, migrating is not an option. > sourceforge has hacked mailman to hide member mail addresses: > "As a result of the latest electronic messaging and privacy requirements > around the world, SourceForge has implemented a number of changes that affect Details please, sf.net. Otherwise the motivation is very probably a completely different one. > email privacy. One part of this is that it is no longer possible for project > admins to view the member emails of their mailing lists." As absurd as it can get if an ML admin isn't allowed to see the email addresses on his/her list. It seems sf.net wants to be abandoned in general .... Just create the new - better - list/s and send subscription information! MfG, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : be...@pe... LUGA : http://www.luga.at |
From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2018-03-20 14:51:57
|
Am Dienstag, 20. März 2018, 03:45:11 CET schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > [...] > > > I checked, migrating is not an option. > > sourceforge has hacked mailman to hide member mail addresses: > > "As a result of the latest electronic messaging and privacy requirements > > around the world, SourceForge has implemented a number of changes that > > affect > Details please, sf.net. > Otherwise the motivation is very probably a completely different one. > > > email privacy. One part of this is that it is no longer possible for > > project admins to view the member emails of their mailing lists." > > As absurd as it can get if an ML admin isn't allowed to see the email > addresses on his/her list. > > It seems sf.net wants to be abandoned in general .... > > Just create the new - better - list/s and send subscription > information! I've talked to dwmw2, we will move to infradead.org. :-) Thanks, //richard |