From: Jeff D. <jd...@ka...> - 2000-03-02 13:28:35
|
> > > it's perfect for my hardware. > > > > Blazing fast processors and tons of everything :-) ? > *smile* P90, 40M maxed out laptop, and tons 'o nothing! I developed this thing on a P66, and it kind of dragged, especially when I was doing SMP (that machine died a few weeks ago, and I was forced to upgrade :-). > Awwww, and I _liked_ the xterms. That's a really cool feature. > Could they at least be an option? I do, too. I'm not turning them off in the kernel. If you really like them, go into /etc/inittab in the package fs, and uncomment the '1' and '2' lines. The xterms will be back, and the kernel will start crashing on you. > ... run "cd /", then "ls -alR" on an xterm... crash with Unimplemented > syscall : 163 > Untested (18468) [0x10154c68]: > syscall_kern.c line 662 on the console... press Ctrl-C on gdb: > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x10085529 in __wait4 () > (gdb) print current_task.comm $1 = "ls\000h\000\000r\000\000\000\000\00 > 0\000\000\000" That's fine. Just knowing that it was ls -alR would have been good. I thought you were maybe running some obscure little program that I hadn't tried yet. > I'll mail you my devfsd rpm I just finished preparing under separate > cover; it's available on request for anyone else. I'm doing that differently now. I'll see if I can slide this rpm thing in somehow. Jeff |