|
From: William S. <wst...@po...> - 2000-03-02 03:00:30
|
Good day, all,
Many thanks to Jeff, Rusty, and all the UML developers and
contributors; I've just tried out the uml kernel and it's amazing! I see
a lot of interesting possibilities for this, and it's perfect for my
hardware.
A few notes:
- 2.3.48_devfs-uml is more stable than 2.3.46-uml; the latter
crashed within a few minutes and sometimes before it finished booting.
2.3.48_devfs stays up longer.
- For those without a devfs capable root_fs, the quick and easy
workaround is to add devfs=nomount to the command line, ala
./linux devfs=nomount
- I'm sure it doesn't surprise you that I'm getting occasional
errors on the uml console. The latest (on 2.3.48_devfs w/ debian root_fs):
Unimplemented syscall : 163
Untested (16019) [0x10154c68]: syscall_kern.c line 662
This showed up while top and ls -alR / were running.
Am I right in guessing that you already know exactly from
execute_syscall which ones need work, or is it useful to hear about these,
either on the mailing list or privately?
I'll try putting together my own root_fs at some point, but need a
working loop device in my host kernel first; 2.3.48-i386 doesn't quite
seem to have it yet.
Thanks again for all your work!
Cheers,
- Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Eagles may soar, high and proud, but weasels don't get sucked
into jet engines."
(Courtesy of Mike Andrews <man...@te...>)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Stearns (wst...@po...). Mason, Buildkernel, named2hosts,
and ipfwadm2ipchains are at: http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|