From: William S. <wst...@po...> - 2000-03-02 03:00:30
|
Good day, all, Many thanks to Jeff, Rusty, and all the UML developers and contributors; I've just tried out the uml kernel and it's amazing! I see a lot of interesting possibilities for this, and it's perfect for my hardware. A few notes: - 2.3.48_devfs-uml is more stable than 2.3.46-uml; the latter crashed within a few minutes and sometimes before it finished booting. 2.3.48_devfs stays up longer. - For those without a devfs capable root_fs, the quick and easy workaround is to add devfs=nomount to the command line, ala ./linux devfs=nomount - I'm sure it doesn't surprise you that I'm getting occasional errors on the uml console. The latest (on 2.3.48_devfs w/ debian root_fs): Unimplemented syscall : 163 Untested (16019) [0x10154c68]: syscall_kern.c line 662 This showed up while top and ls -alR / were running. Am I right in guessing that you already know exactly from execute_syscall which ones need work, or is it useful to hear about these, either on the mailing list or privately? I'll try putting together my own root_fs at some point, but need a working loop device in my host kernel first; 2.3.48-i386 doesn't quite seem to have it yet. Thanks again for all your work! Cheers, - Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Eagles may soar, high and proud, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines." (Courtesy of Mike Andrews <man...@te...>) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wst...@po...). Mason, Buildkernel, named2hosts, and ipfwadm2ipchains are at: http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |