From: Jeff D. <jd...@ka...> - 2000-10-17 05:16:24
|
em...@mi... said: > I'm interested in helping out with UML if it's needed or wanted. Sure. The more the merrier. > What exactly is the status of SMP in UML now? It's the victim of bitrot. It's been allowed to atrophy. > If SMP isn't in UML now, how should SMP be defined for it? The only thing needed to support SMP is to make sure that the arch code is SMP-safe. All of the other support is there. I've put some #errors in where I know something is not SMP-safe. It will fail to compile if you turn on SMP and try to build it. So, those need fixing, and a scan through the rest of the arch code would need to be done and locking added as needed. If you don't know what SMP-safety is, let me know, and I'll see how well I can explain it. > Finally, I use to be fluent in broken French, so maybe I could work on > translating the web site. That would be cool... There are some other projects which would be interesting. Near the top of the list is a 'hostfs' filesystem which provides access to the host filesystem. This would be a virtual filesystem which plugs into the VFS layer and converts vfs calls into their libc equivalents. If you want more choices, let me know. I can probably think of some... Jeff |