From: David C. <tec...@li...> - 2000-10-10 20:39:13
|
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Jeff Dike wrote: > Anyway, the patch below removes 256 bytes from the set_signals frame. It > ought to alleviate things a bit. I'll be looking for other things I can do, > as well. Let me know how it works for you. I tried to apply that patch to a checkout of the uml code from cvs, and it failed. Either it has been applied (doesn't look like it) to the code which is in cvs already, or I'm doing something stupid. Ideas? -- David Coulson tec...@so... |