Re: [User-mode-linux-devel] Re: Kernel panic in 2.4.0-test8-cvs-000913

[William S. <wst...@po...>]

Good morning, Jeff,

On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Jeff Dike wrote:

> wst...@po... said:
> > Kernel panic: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x0, ip 0x1000160c
> 
> What I also want is the results of
> 	i sym 0x1000160c
> 	i line *0x1000160c

(gdb) i sym 0x1000160c
dequeue_signal + 48 in section .text
(gdb) i line *0x1000160c
Line 201 of
"/usr/src/uml-linux/linux-2.4.0-test8.uml/include/asm/arch/signal.h" starts
at address 0x10001609 <dequeue_signal+45>
   and ends at 0x10001611 <dequeue_signal+53>.

> and a stack trace of the panic.

	Boy, I hope this is what you're looking for:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x100a9a89 in __wait4 ()
#1  0xbffff5c4 in ?? ()
#2  0x1009d6b9 in linux_wait (pid=-1, status=0xbffff5c4, flags=2) at
user_util.c:152
#3  0x1009ca32 in signals (init_proc=0x1009ce88 <start_kernel_proc>,
sp=0x1011dffc) at trap_user.c:98
#4  0x1009d35f in linux_main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff6d4) at um_arch.c:189
#5  0x100011d6 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff6d4, envp=0xbffff6e0) at
/usr/src/uml-linux/linux-2.4.0-test8.uml/arch/um/main.c:54

	If not, I still have it running...
	Cheers,
	- Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
	If you've been pounding nails with your forehead for years, it may
feel strange the first time somebody hands you a hammer. But that
doesn't mean that you should strap the hammer to a headband just to give
your skull that old familiar jolt.
	-- Wayne Throop, during the ``TCL Wars''
(Courtesy of Steve Dodd <di...@lo...>)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Stearns (wst...@po...).  Mason, Buildkernel, named2hosts, 
and ipfwadm2ipchains are at:                http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns
LinuxMonth; articles for Linux Enthusiasts! http://www.linuxmonth.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------