From: Gerald B. <gbr...@mi...> - 2000-05-01 02:21:45
|
> I don't see an easy way for the ethertap-based virtual network to operate in > a host routed network. F.e. the host acts as the gateway to the uml private > network and provides firewall services (IP MASQ). The way all this would work, the virtual net would look just like an ethernet to both the host system (as network interface tap0) and to the virtual systems (as network interface eth0) ... these can be treated as any other ethernet and if the host machine has an uplink connection, it can route between them. If the host has an ethernet connection, the host can either route between the two, or it can setup bridging between the two networks so they seem to be one larger ethernet. This allows arbitrary firewalling to be potentially setup between the real network and the virtual network, or it allows for the virtual network to act as if it were directly part of the real network. -- Gerald |