Re: [User-mode-linux-devel] UML on non-x86?

[lars b. <la...@no...>]

Chris Emerson <cem...@ch...> writes:
> I see that for now umlinux is x86 only at the moment.  I'd quite like
> to see it working on other architectures, particularly powerpc.  Has
> anyone done any work towards it?  If so, then I'd like to help.  If
> not, I'd like to have a go at it and would appreciate someone pointing
> me in the right direction to get started.  :-)

Not that Linux/a386 is anything near as functional as uml is, but it's
designed with a very clear separation of the architecture-dependant
stuff: Linux/a386 itself written completely in portable C code, and
the a386 hardware abstraction library contains C and assembler implementing
all architecure-dependant functionality.

http://linux.a386.nocrew.org/
http://a386.nocrew.org/