From: William S. <wst...@po...> - 2000-03-17 18:29:00
|
Good afternoon, Jeff et al, Quick question - Have you approached Alan Cox about including that short patch necessary for the host kernel in 2.2.x, x>15? I know it's way too late for 2.2.15, but it would mean that future 2.2 kernel users could use uml without having to recompile the kernel. Despite my best efforts to make that possible (Buildkernel, in my .sig), I strongly suspect most people stay with whatever their distribution provides and never compile their own. Does that patch fall in the category of "iffy, development kernel only", or "so trivially correct that it could very well make it into 2.2.x"? Cheers, - Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Windows NT: n. 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. (Courtesy of Michael Neuffer <ne...@tr...>) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wst...@po...). Mason, Buildkernel, named2hosts, and ipfwadm2ipchains are at: http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns LinuxMonth; articles for Linux Enthusiasts! http://www.linuxmonth.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |