From: William S. <wst...@po...> - 2000-03-12 21:51:56
|
Good afternoon, Jeff and all, I'm working on networking for UML - I finally have it functioning! Thanks for the pointer, Jeff. I'll summarize what I've learned in a bit. One note, though. After bringing the interface up, typing: ifconfig umn down successfully returns to the command prompt, but promptly hangs uml with a: umn_read had error, errno = 9 on the console and the idle thread at 99% on the host. It appears the uml patch hardcodes the address used on the host side. How would it be if, on the uml side, the user was expected to do: ifconfig umn 172.20.0.244 pointopoint 172.20.0.253 From which the uml-kernel could extract the pointopoint address and execute um_ifconfig sl0 172.20.0.253 pointopoint 172.20.0.244 , rather than having to hardcode an address. If two uml's were running at the same time, then you could have 4 separate addresses, two for each pointopoint link. I suppose Nirvanha would be to have sl0 on the host be able to talk to multiple UML's on a simulated ethernet cable: host OS sl0: 192.168.12.1/24 uml1 umn: 192.168.12.2/24, default route ->1 uml2 umn: 192.168.12.3/24, default route ->1 uml3 umn: 192.168.12.4/24, default route ->1 Cheers, - Bill 'way too many damn suggestions' Stearns --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. (Courtesy of Matthew Harrell <mha...@st...>) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wst...@po...). Mason, Buildkernel, named2hosts, and ipfwadm2ipchains are at: http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns LinuxMonth; articles for Linux Enthusiasts! http://www.linuxmonth.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |