From: Thomas M. <th...@m3...> - 2017-05-22 19:19:01
|
> Am 22.05.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Richard Weinberger <ri...@no...>: > > Thomas, > >> Am 22.05.2017 um 20:14 schrieb Thomas Meyer: >> It's purely cosmetic; to get rid of the boot message: "This architecture does not have kernel memory protection." in init/main.c >> >> Which isn't true for UML as all read only stuff should end up in a read only ELF section. Shouldn't it? > > Hmm, reading /proc/<pid of uml>/maps tells a different story on my host. > Did you check? No... I may should have done so... Okay, but it should be possible to mprotect those regions ? > > Thanks, > //richard |