From: Richard W. <ric...@gm...> - 2017-05-21 21:49:19
|
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Meyer <th...@m3...> wrote: >> On Tue, 16 May 2017 17:46:47 +0200 >> Thomas Meyer <th...@m3...> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> as far as I understand everything under os-Linux should be OS specific >>> and shouldn't rely on kernel functions. >> >> I see, but umid.c already uses many printk()s. So that policy >> is not so clear now. For example, without this series, > > Yes you are right. I did write nonsense! > > I'm fine with all patches in series. Looks good to me! Yeah, the policy is not so clear. In theory os-Linux should contain no kernel stuff, but the printk()s do not hurt, in most cases. -- Thanks, //richard |