Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] UML on WSL

[Richard W. <ri...@no...>]

Thomas,

Am 09.05.2017 um 19:25 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>> IOW we write to 0xdeadbeef, catch the fault and fix it.
> 
> I get this:
> thomas@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U:/mnt/c/Users/thomas/VmShare$ ./segtest
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up

Meh, that's a show-stopper.
WSL does not provide a valid signal machine context...

Thanks,
//richard