Re: [uml-user] Could UML run via seccomp traps instead of ptrace?

[Jeff D. <jd...@ad...>]

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:49:13AM -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
>     So I'm curious.  There is another option -- seccomp-bpf can trap on
> arbitrary syscalls.  Is there a reason anyone sees why UML couldn't be
> routed through it?

You need to be able to annull system calls.  Dunno if seccomp can do
that, but if it can, as well as read them out which I assume it can,
you're golden.

				Jeff

-- 
Jeff Dike
AddToIt
978-254-0789 (o)
978-394-8986 (c)