Re: [uml-user] [PATCH v4] um: net: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC when spinlock is held

[Richard W. <ri...@no...>]

Am 29.10.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Saurabh Sengar:
> since GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC while spinlock is held,
> as code while holding a spinlock should be atomic.
> GFP_KERNEL may sleep and can cause deadlock,
> where as GFP_ATOMIC may fail but certainly avoids deadlockdex f70dd54..d898f6c 100644
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <sau...@gm...>

Applied!

Thanks,
//richard