From: Daniel W. <sa...@0x...> - 2014-10-20 09:28:36
|
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Meyer" <th...@m3...> > To: "user-mode-linux-devel" <use...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 4:14:13 PM > Subject: [uml-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] um: enable trace irqflags support > > Add TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT to UML. > This enables LOCKDEP_SUPPORT and TRACING_SUPPORT. FYI: I'm currently working on porting ftrace() support to uml. It will take another week or two since I don't have enough time to debug, and it isn't stable yet (read as is panic()ing randomly) > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <th...@m3...> > --- > diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.common b/arch/um/Kconfig.common > index 87bc868..6a33c3a 100644 > --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.common > +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.common > @@ -28,10 +28,9 @@ config PCI > config PCMCIA > bool > > -# Yet to do! > config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT > bool > - default n > + default y > > config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT > bool > diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h > b/arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h > index c780d8a..c5b636e 100644 > --- a/arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h > +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/irqflags.h > @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ static inline unsigned long > arch_local_irq_save(void) > return flags; > } > > -static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void) > +static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags) > { > - return arch_local_save_flags() == 0; > + return flags == 0; > } > > #endif I'm not sure if this is correct. I'd rather would have another function implemented instead of removing the check for disabled irqs. cheers, daniel |