Re: [uml-user] does running trinity within a user mode linux makes sense

[Dave J. <da...@re...>]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:47:57PM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
 > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Toralf Förster <tor...@gm...> wrote:
 > > On 03/10/2013 10:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
 > >> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:25:01PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
 > >>  > ?
 > >>
 > >> It would need to be ported due to the different syscall table.
 > >> I wrote aobut this being fairly easy recently:
 > >> http://codemonkey.org.uk/2013/03/04/architecture-support-trinity/
 > >>
 > >> There's also a porting doc in Documentation/
 > >
 > > Understood.
 > >
 > > I'm rather a I-bother-devs-with-bug-reports-user than a developer, but
 > > I'm Cc:ing the UML user list - maybe there's a volunteer ?
 > 
 > Erm, the UML syscall table is identical to x86(_x64).
 > That's why you can run any x86 program within UML...

ah, cool.  For some reason I thought there were some uml specific extensions.

I stand corrected.

In which case, it should be good to go.

	Dave