|
From: richard -r. w. <ric...@gm...> - 2013-03-11 21:48:08
|
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Toralf Förster <tor...@gm...> wrote: > On 03/10/2013 10:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:25:01PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: >> > ? >> >> It would need to be ported due to the different syscall table. >> I wrote aobut this being fairly easy recently: >> http://codemonkey.org.uk/2013/03/04/architecture-support-trinity/ >> >> There's also a porting doc in Documentation/ > > Understood. > > I'm rather a I-bother-devs-with-bug-reports-user than a developer, but > I'm Cc:ing the UML user list - maybe there's a volunteer ? Erm, the UML syscall table is identical to x86(_x64). That's why you can run any x86 program within UML... -- Thanks, //richard |