|
From: Chris F. <cd...@fo...> - 2012-07-05 20:58:55
|
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:38:51PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > The article describes nothing that is not also doable with KVM these days. > Anyway, UML is fun and nice to use. :-) Doesn't KVM require the extra VM CPU features? For older CPU's, I thought UML was more efficient. Am I also out of date? :-) Thanks, - Chris |