Re: [uml-user] routing table error in 2.6.39 ..

[David M. <da...@da...>]

From: ratheesh kannoth <rat...@gm...>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:25:47 +0530

> in 2.6.38 routing  table is  correct. But in 2.6.39 default gw appears
> on top of the routing table. same problem persist in 3.0.0 also.

You cannot depend upon the order in which routing table entries
are listed by the kernel.

The table internally is correct, and lookups will match using the
proper longest-matching-prefix algorithm.