|
From: Paul W. <pd...@ex...> - 2004-03-02 10:12:33
|
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:37:06PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > pd...@ex... said: > > How hard would it be to make it so that it never hangs up the TTY > > inside the UML machine? From my point of view, it would be perfectly > > acceptable, possibly even desirable, that a session inside the machine > > remains open through multiple connections to the pts. > > That's not how terminals work. When one is detached, the session on > it dies. That depends. If I'm using minicom to access a console on the serial port it depends on whether I tell minicom to hangup when I disconnect (I don't usually). This is not my real concern - I'm not too fussed about whether the session dies or not. My real concern is whether I can connect to it afterwards (new session or otherwise). If I put the initial console on the serial port, I can't reconnect to that console after a disconnect. > If you don't want that, what's wrong with putting the session inside a screen > and detaching that? That works for me, but not for users. I need to make the system fool-proof so that users can't lose the ability to connect to their machine just because they hit the wrong button when leaving screen. Also, I use a rather more stripped down terminal emulator as I don't wish to make screen available to users. Paul |