Re: [UrJTAG-dev] keeping a "MAINTAINERS" or "REFERENCES" file

[Arnim L. <arn...@gm...>]

> with urjtag covering quite a distinct number of processors and devices, it 
> seems like it'd be a good idea to maintain a file with people who can 
> test/answer questions about certain devices, or for groups of people who 
> actively maintain sections of code.

Yes, that's definitely a good a idea. Personally, I'd be interested to
have an overview of which parts are in active use, maintained, or even
orphaned. "Active use" would be different from "volunteering to test";
like in "using UrJTAG to flash a certain device" vs. "willing to test
flash algo changes with one's device".

Arnim