#101 STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L (sharc21065l) is wrong?

0.17
closed
UrJTAG (102)
5
2013-02-28
2009-07-05
No

I'm not sure if it is bug. So please resolve as 'won't fix' if this issue is based on my misunderstandings.

Regarding to data/analog/adsp21065l/STEPPINGS, ADSP-21065L has DI register. But it's described ADSP-21065L don' t have DI register in the current datasheet.
(Page: D-28 of http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/processor_manuals/3789835185494138226006565L_book_tr.pdf )

The contents in data/analog/adsp21065l/STEPPINGS should be removed, I think.

Discussion

  • Arnim Läuger

    Arnim Läuger - 2009-07-15

    I can't find this file in the UrJTAG code base. Could it be that you retrieved it from some other source?

     
  • Arnim Läuger

    Arnim Läuger - 2009-07-15
    • labels: --> UrJTAG
    • milestone: --> 0.x
    • assigned_to: nobody --> arniml
     
  • Mike Frysinger

    Mike Frysinger - 2010-07-14

    i'll take this since i work for ADI

     
  • Mike Frysinger

    Mike Frysinger - 2010-07-14
    • assigned_to: arniml --> vapier
    • summary: STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L is wrong? --> STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L (sharc21065l) is wrong?
     
  • MURANAKA Masaki

    MURANAKA Masaki - 2013-02-28

    I forgot the point of issue. So I close it for now.

     
  • MURANAKA Masaki

    MURANAKA Masaki - 2013-02-28
    • status: open --> closed
     
  • Kolja Waschk

    Kolja Waschk - 2017-02-12
    • Group: 0.x --> 0.17
     

Log in to post a comment.