Universal JTAG library, server and tools / Bugs / #101 STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L (sharc21065l) is wrong?

#101 STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L (sharc21065l) is wrong?

Milestone: 0.17

Status: closed

Owner: Mike Frysinger

Labels: UrJTAG (101)

Priority: 5

Updated: 2013-02-28

Created: 2009-07-05

Creator: MURANAKA Masaki

Private: No

I'm not sure if it is bug. So please resolve as 'won't fix' if this issue is based on my misunderstandings.

Regarding to data/analog/adsp21065l/STEPPINGS, ADSP-21065L has DI register. But it's described ADSP-21065L don' t have DI register in the current datasheet.
(Page: D-28 of http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/processor_manuals/3789835185494138226006565L_book_tr.pdf )

The contents in data/analog/adsp21065l/STEPPINGS should be removed, I think.

Discussion

Arnim Läuger - 2009-07-15

I can't find this file in the UrJTAG code base. Could it be that you retrieved it from some other source?

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Arnim Läuger - 2009-07-15

labels: --> UrJTAG

milestone: --> 0.x

assigned_to: nobody --> arniml
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

MURANAKA Masaki - 2009-07-19

Files:
http://urjtag.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/urjtag/trunk/jtag/data/analog/sharc21065l/
http://urjtag.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/urjtag/trunk/urjtag/data/analog/sharc21065l/

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Arnim Läuger - 2009-08-10

Yes, even the BSDL files provided by AD don't show a DI register:
http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/bsdl_files/43680419993562925867107bsdl_21065l_qfp.txt
Wonder how the information in PARTS and STEPPINGS were derived.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Mike Frysinger - 2010-07-14

i'll take this since i work for ADI

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Mike Frysinger - 2010-07-14

assigned_to: arniml --> vapier

summary: STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L is wrong? --> STEPPINGS for ADSP-21065L (sharc21065l) is wrong?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

MURANAKA Masaki - 2013-02-28

I forgot the point of issue. So I close it for now.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

MURANAKA Masaki - 2013-02-28

status: open --> closed
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Kolja Waschk - 2017-02-12

Group: 0.x --> 0.17
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Log in to post a comment.