|
From: <ok...@ya...> - 2002-02-18 17:38:59
|
Sorry, this is a bit quick because I have to catch a train. In two weeks I should have more time than I do at the moment. --- kris m <kr...@ev...> wrote: > Yes, we already agreed on the GPL. Though if you have anything which other programs may want to link against, those parts may need to be LGPL. > So, you mean "just use the loopback interface" by default? Make the My knowledge of sockets is a bit out of date but from what I remember, you could open different types. Those which are local and those which go over the network. > entirely sure what you mean by "interface module" - I think you mean > in > the same fashion that what we're calling the "console client" is an > interface module. Is that what you mean? I have absolutely no problem Its a slightly different to above but we could have the server daemon as a interface module like console/gui clients. > Hrm, I'm not sure I quite understand what you mean by "different > areas." > Can you give a small example of the XML file you're envisioning? Well a samba.xml or dhcp.xml might be a single area. Directories at the higher level would describe things like "Security and Users", "Network", "Applications". samba.xml would describe all the things which can be done to configure samba. > > search for the XML descriptions in these directories. > I think our "shared vision" is a bit skewered. What's contained in > those > directories? Similar to /etc, or? The xml files I was talking about above. I fear that the changing multiple hosts together may be troublesome because they might have different initial configurations. Oliver __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com |