From: Daniel F. <dan...@mb...> - 2008-07-25 12:44:59
|
Greg Troxel wrote: > Daniel Falk <dan...@mb...> writes: > > >> It seems to me that the exposure and probably curves as well, are >> sometimes too dark, sometimes too light. Really it's all over the >> place. This is the case if I have set the exposure to "auto", but it's >> also the case if I leave it alone. Is this a typical experience? >> > > My experience (D200 mostly) is that exposure is usually too dark, so > that +0.5 is required to get a jpg that sort of is like the camera's jpg. > > >> I wonder why with other properties of my raw file, UFRaw is able to >> comprehend them and apply them, while the exposure settings seem to be >> lost entirely. For example, I can select "Camera WB", and that WB is >> > > It's not that they are lost - it is that ufraw's conversion of bits to > jpg values does not match the camera. > > >> applied perfectly, but I can't seem to select "Camera Exposure". Am I >> > > that is 0.0 on the EV scale. > > 0.0 on the EV is sometimes too dark, other times too light and I wouldn't say that it's off by only a little. But it's good to know what the intended behavior here is. Should I file a bug report? I can also provide sample NEFs if anybody needs them. |