From: Martin L. <mar...@ea...> - 2007-12-29 22:37:56
|
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:32:53PM +0100, Udi Fuchs wrote: > > I sounds like a good way to split the work. Okay, I'll get started on that then. > It seems that UFRaw should go in the direction of splitting the code > for generating the preview and the code for generating the output. At > first I tried to avoid it, but there are subtle differences that make > using the same code a headache. Yeah, that probably makes sense. They can always call common stuff where appropriate. > I don't see why Fuji images will get rotated twice, but I didn't think > about it too deeply. In the case where a user applies a rotation to a Fuji image, the current proposal would rotate it once in the existing fuji_rotate() and then again to get the final rotated output, until someone tidies that up to do it in a single rotation step. Martin |