From: Paul M. <le...@ch...> - 2001-02-19 07:16:36
|
It has come to my attention that the current font setup under libfbx just plain sucks. In fact, sucking would be a good thing in comparison. We need to do a few of the following before it will be even remotely useful: - Include a lame default font in a header + This can be small + It gives us a fallback for systems not equipped with our list of supported fonts. - Provide support for other types of fonts + We can dynamically load a wide variety of different fonts. =09 The only problem with supporting multiple types of fonts, is the lame overhead (and code size) that we add into libfbx just for supporting them. Right now, libfbx-font.c is roughly 13kB. Reallistically, we don't want to exceed 25kB on all of our font support in total (not including the font in a header, of course). So.. I'm open to suggestions that people have on what we should look at supporting. Any other points anyone want to make on this issue? Regards, --=20 ,----------------------------------------------------, | Paul Mundt | Email: le...@ch... | | Head Developer | URL: http://www.u4x.org | | Head of Security | URL: http://www.stampede.org | `----------------------------------------------------' |