From: Markus U. <mar...@gm...> - 2008-09-13 14:58:40
|
Hi, 2008/9/13 Kenneth Lavrsen <ke...@la...> > > I think the original fix did exactly what we had agreed to do and I > would revert back to that - maybe with a double __ > Ok course, I don't have a problem with short suffxes ;) A double underscore following a number is short, and it differs from the manual solution "---++ Requirements <!-- 1 -->", so it would still be visible as 'renamed' (if one needs to know that). Since a number of users prefer this and didn't care about clashes with manually inserted 'raw' html anchors, it certainly would make a configuration option/documentation superfluous. Therefore, I'd be happy to use "__" instead. (I guess a simple footnote/sentence about the renaming should be added to the appropriate discussion of heading/anchor markup.) Ad astra, Markus |