Re: [TWiki-Dev] Re: Table-based PatternSkin?

[Arthur C. <acl...@xs...>]

On May 1, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Martin@Cleaver.org wrote:

> Hi Kenneth,
>    Thanks for the feedback - it is useful to understand the sorts  
> of conditions that table-based designs will fail. As Aaron and I  
> worked extremely hard and are 98% of the way now to a viable  
> positional CSS based design I am less troubled by the notion of  
> Positional CSS than I was at the start of the weekend... I will  
> certainly work with Arthur to document and package the CSS elements  
> I built, as although they were not much in volume they include some  
> key tricks.
>
> That said, for our purposes, using TWiki as a web publishing  
> platform, a table based design would have:
>
> - controlled graphics
> - no verbatim text
> - controlled tables with known column widths
>
> As such, in some circumstances I claim TWiki would continue to be  
> fine with a table-based layout.

It is not clear what you have achieved: an alternative css layout, or  
a alternative table-based layout?

Arthur