From: Rafael A. <sor...@ya...> - 2006-03-08 22:05:18
|
Peter, This is not a problem of managing "Stale Content". Is more a problem of the tremendous chaos that is Codev. I ask "What is the purpose of Codev"? I see it has several uses: 1. Brainstorm Ideas, that later are made into Features 2. Report Bugs and Issues 3. Serve as a place to store... interesting stuff (Howto's, links to the competition, etc) 4. Track & Announce releases As such, Codev has accumulated too much "cruft" over the years because it's was overloaded" with too many responsibilities. Now, we can see that some of the responsibilities of Codev are being moved to other places: 2. Report Bugs and issues: This is being done in Support and Bugs 4. Track & Announce releases: Tracking is being done in the Bugs web. What I think that we should do is: * Move all the Bug reports, feature done and release tracking topics "out of the way" (Attic?). * Either move all the Feature brainstorming discussion to a Development web, or all the "interesting stuff" someplace else (I vote for the former, as I think it's easier). * Use each place for it's function, and only that function alone. I strongly disagree that tagging content will help. It won't help the WebChanges being flooded with content I don't care about while moving out of the page the content I *do* care (no, I *don't* want to use the RSS feed), nor it will help the severe performance impact in search while looking through 4000+ topics, and won't help when I look for information about the META PI and I need to scan 500+ unrelevant topics. Think about this: If you are looking for information that you've never look at and don't know how to classify, what is your first choice: Google or del.icio.us? -- Best regards, Rafael mailto:sor...@ya... |