On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Ronald Tögl <ron...@ia...> wrote:
> Davide Vernizzi wrote:
>
>>>> Do you have any other process which bind at the 30003?
>>>
>>> As to be expected, I did have the jTSS service running. :-)
>>> After freeing the socket, trousers works fine. It would be a good thing
>>> to have the port number configurable, right?
>>
>> Yes, you are right (we are actually working on this right now)... but
>> then also applications must change the port number accordingly (maybe by
>> specifying a URI in the Tspi_Context_Connect).
>
>> BTW, under Windows (Vista & 7) TrouSerS is built to use the TBS, which
>> "multiplexes" the TPM and allows for concurrent TSS. We successfully
>> tested TrouSerS in parallel with IFX's stack, and it would be nice to
>> test also with jTSS. Does jTSS have configurable port number? If yes,
>> could you test if they can coexist?
>
> I just did some testing and decided to change the jTSS default port to
> 30004. This should help avoid collisions. It will be included in the
> upcoming release of jTSS.
>
> With this change I can confirm that jTSS and Trousers coexist happily on a
> single TBS-multiplexed TPM.
Cool. Many thanks.
> Regards,
> Ronald
>
> --
> Dipl.-Ing. Ronald Tögl phone +43 316/873-5502
> Trusted Computing Labs fax +43 316/873-5520
> IAIK ron...@ia...
> Graz University of Technology http://www.iaik.tugraz.at
>
>
>
--
Davide
|
