From: Ronald T. <ron...@ia...> - 2010-03-01 15:06:24
|
Davide Vernizzi wrote: >>> Do you have any other process which bind at the 30003? >> As to be expected, I did have the jTSS service running. :-) >> After freeing the socket, trousers works fine. It would be a good thing >> to have the port number configurable, right? > Yes, you are right (we are actually working on this right now)... but > then also applications must change the port number accordingly (maybe by > specifying a URI in the Tspi_Context_Connect). > BTW, under Windows (Vista & 7) TrouSerS is built to use the TBS, which > "multiplexes" the TPM and allows for concurrent TSS. We successfully > tested TrouSerS in parallel with IFX's stack, and it would be nice to > test also with jTSS. Does jTSS have configurable port number? If yes, > could you test if they can coexist? I just did some testing and decided to change the jTSS default port to 30004. This should help avoid collisions. It will be included in the upcoming release of jTSS. With this change I can confirm that jTSS and Trousers coexist happily on a single TBS-multiplexed TPM. Regards, Ronald -- Dipl.-Ing. Ronald Tögl phone +43 316/873-5502 Trusted Computing Labs fax +43 316/873-5520 IAIK ron...@ia... Graz University of Technology http://www.iaik.tugraz.at |