Re: [Trinux-talk] Busybox

[Duane <du...@ca...>]

I have compiled busybox 0.60.3 on slackware 7.1 and replaced the busybox on 
one of my boot floppies with the 0.60.3 version.

My ls is now in color, when I type poweroff I get the same responses as if 
I had typed halt instead of the applet not found error (still does not 
power off the laptop I am testing on), and there appears to be no change in 
the du and df commands.

This is the first time I have done something like this, what should I be 
testing to see if the new busybox has a problem with trinux?

Thanks,
Duane.



At 02:20 PM 6/19/2002, you wrote:
>I am contemplating using busybox 0.60.3 with the 0.80rc2 release.  Has 
>anybody already done this?  If I understand the boot process correctly, 
>all I have to do is replace the busybox in initrd.gz on the boot 
>floppy.  Am I right?
>
>Thanks,
>Duane.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
>
>_______________________________________________
>Trinux-talk mailing list
>Tri...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/trinux-talk