From: Glen T. <gd...@gd...> - 2008-05-25 15:28:26
|
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 19:53 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > I never quite understood the rationale behind that one either: > if you worry about someone else controlling the timing of these events, > why do you not worry about timings on the local system. e.g. > it's not that hard to predict with similar accuracy when a hard disk > interrupt happened when a local process read something from disk. Or > when the keyboard/USB interrupt happened when you process keyboard input. Accepting packets requires you to trust another party -- the network provider and users of your host's networked services -- which you do not have to trust otherwise. |