The idea for this RFE comes from a bug in the latest version of UltraExplorer, which pass the active object twice to the (context menu) command handler in a certain situation.
Then I realized many other commands didn't exhibit the problem, and that it would be easy to get into trouble or some major annoyance while using the Windows Explorer search (selecting folders or files that are actually nested and using "Commit" or "Add Contents"). I guess I didn't notice it before because cvsnt seems to handle redundant files decently. Or maybe it's just really not that much of a common situation ;-)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=382855
Originator: NO
I don't get it. Can you give an example?
Logged In: YES
user_id=99702
Originator: YES
The idea for this RFE comes from a bug in the latest version of UltraExplorer, which pass the active object twice to the (context menu) command handler in a certain situation.
Then I realized many other commands didn't exhibit the problem, and that it would be easy to get into trouble or some major annoyance while using the Windows Explorer search (selecting folders or files that are actually nested and using "Commit" or "Add Contents"). I guess I didn't notice it before because cvsnt seems to handle redundant files decently. Or maybe it's just really not that much of a common situation ;-)