You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(15) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(11) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
2002 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(3) |
2004 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(16) |
Apr
|
May
(17) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2005 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(80) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(17) |
2006 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(8) |
2007 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(28) |
2009 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
2010 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2015 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <ka...@vz...> - 2013-06-14 18:51:13
|
Biostem Corp. has been named as the number 1 pick for today so you could act fast traders due Tresses are a liquid play about to produce a Huge activity here short-run. World thinks Friday is the better time to join up as Locks are dirt cheap trading quickly to the underside and jumping. Locks are getting well-known on the street. We suggest something important is coming tomorrow and at those abnormal amounts, the opportunity gains could possibly Great temporary as H_A_I_R's promo constantly on grow. Biostem U.S. may see some Super Momentum now and Wednesday at the base spike this article so get be equipped traders. H_A_I_R seems to become the number one play in the Micro-Cap markets for any Bottom spike right here and this moment. 35 month highest is USD 3.10! With news developing and trader alert going to skyrocket we presume H_A_I_R is a great buying chance of our buyers that are interested in swift short-run returns. With this very reason we all very thrilled as it allows us to alert H_A_I_R to vip traders right since its beginning to take off majorly short-term. Biostem U.S. Corp. recently released great headlines. We signal huge trading from H_A_I_R and we recommend that you initiate buying stock on Jun 14th! |
From: Levi N. <ln...@sd...> - 2011-05-23 01:16:45
|
A quick hello to tnt-devel. I use GNU Emacs 23.1.1, and would like to help out with GNU Emacs support for tnt. Will keep the dev list posted if I find any useful information. Cheers. |
From: Tremayne F. <wir...@es...> - 2010-06-13 20:43:43
|
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1251\deff0\deflang1049{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset204{\*\fname Arial;}Arial CYR;}{\f1\fswiss\fcharset204{\*\fname Arial;}Arial CYR;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green128\blue0;} {\*\generator Msftedit 1.10.29.4483;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\sa200\sl276\slmult1\lang9\f0\fs32{\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "h{\*\dd 1.10.29.4483;}ttp://clubpalace.info"}}{\fldrslt{\ul\cf1 http://clubpalace.info}}}\f0\cf1\b\fs32 - ONLINE CASINO!\par \line\cf2\b\f0\fs28 VIP CLUB Casino is a great online casino that offers the unique combination of top quality games, high payouts and a 24/7 professional customer support.\par \par100 progressive games with towering jackpots, which are ready to explode and can make multi-millionaires out of VIP CLUB players! Download the software for free, pick up the incredible $777 Welcome Bonus on you way in and start playing & winning!\par } |
From: Szabolcs S. <sza...@gm...> - 2010-05-15 17:44:58
|
Hey Guys, I've been using this TNT stuff for a couple of weeks. I experienced issues with the AIM Blast chat functionality. Namely your authorizing "!1" reply to those outside request doesn't have any effect. I've downloaded the CVS head revision recently and investigated the reason. It is that the AIM Blast rooms are named like [roomname], with the brackets. The default behaviour coded into toc-normalize only removes spaces etc. and the message is sent like "toc_send_im [room] \"!1\"". The thing is that brackets should be escaped here. In the same time if you try to login with "\"loginname\"" (your screen name surrounded with quotes), it doesn't work (actually I don't know why). Therefore I introduced some additional code @toc-normalize and I'd like to check it in as user grault@sourceforge.. It's like this: RCS file: /cvsroot/tnt/tnt/toc.el,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -r1.29 toc.el 508a509,517 > (defun toc-encoding-is-necessary (str) > (let ((encoded (toc-encode str))) > (not (string= str (substring encoded 1 (1- (length encoded))))))) > > (defun toc-soft-encode (str) > (if (not (toc-encoding-is-necessary str)) > str > (toc-encode str))) > 510c519 < "Removes spaces and smashes STR to lowercase." --- > "Removes spaces and smashes STR to lowercase & encodes it if necessary." 514c523 < str "")) --- > (toc-soft-encode str) "")) Cheers, Szabolcs |
From: Bachtold P. <vot...@fu...> - 2010-03-21 18:43:03
|
When he arrived there, he found three of his brother officers in possession. With that hearty and genial tone of good-fellowship which is only used and felt between men who have passed through hardships together, and know the true worth of each other, they greeted him. He confided to them the cause of his unusual exertion after a trying night on outpost duty, and wearily dropped himself onto some ammunition-boxes, which were serving the purpose of a chair. The talk naturally turned to the condition of affairs, but argument waned for lack of an opposing side--the unanimous opinion being that the "gugus" did not and never would know when they were "licked." Sever arose, walked over to a native bed, and began cleaning his revolver, occasionally g |
From: Shop C. S. A. P. on www.nc46.c. <tac...@be...> - 2010-03-07 21:39:52
|
ussur i annex packe ted shamm ing epide mical reset table amalg amize heath endom deadl iness sinfo niett a retic ently south erly molle scent grinn ing perce ptual haloc line agon wadde d reset table obser vance semid rying amalg amize |
From: Ulrich M. <ul...@ge...> - 2010-02-20 07:47:50
|
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, NeilFred Picciotto wrote: >>> How did the TiK developers go about changing their license? Did >>> they actually get any kind of approval to do so from AOL or did >>> they just change it assuming that AOL would never bother to come >>> after them? >> >> It would be interested to hear how they handled the situation, we >> might be able to just follow suit. > The thread that Ulrich linked to -- > http://www.mail-archive.com/deb...@li.../msg04343.html > includes messages (labeled as coming from "tictoc") which kind of > sound like they may have come from someone actually at AOL...? That thread (including all e-mail addresses) is also archived here: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/03/msg00200.html> Ulrich |
From: NeilFred P. <nei...@gm...> - 2010-02-20 02:45:45
|
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jim Whitehead II <jnw...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:00 PM, NeilFred Picciotto <nei...@gm...> wrote: >> Of all the developers who have contributed to TNT since the >> SourceForge project was created, I suspect that nobody would have any >> problem at all with changing the license to be more free. The license >> text that's in there is probably just whatever AOL put in when they >> originally released the initial version of the code; I don't think >> anyone has bothered to change it. > > Indeed, but that's really my point. The codebase we contributed to > already began with a license and we can't just override that without > some actually standing to do so. Right, exactly my point as well. :) Hence my question about how TiK did it. >> How did the TiK developers go about changing their license? Did they >> actually get any kind of approval to do so from AOL or did they just >> change it assuming that AOL would never bother to come after them? > > It would be interested to hear how they handled the situation, we > might be able to just follow suit. The thread that Ulrich linked to -- http://www.mail-archive.com/deb...@li.../msg04343.html includes messages (labeled as coming from "tictoc") which kind of sound like they may have come from someone actually at AOL...? Of course that was over 10 years ago, so even if we could get hold of the email address that message came from, they probably no longer work for AOL. :) -- NeilFred Picciotto |
From: Jim W. II <jnw...@gm...> - 2010-02-19 23:24:53
|
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:00 PM, NeilFred Picciotto <nei...@gm...> wrote: > Of all the developers who have contributed to TNT since the > SourceForge project was created, I suspect that nobody would have any > problem at all with changing the license to be more free. The license > text that's in there is probably just whatever AOL put in when they > originally released the initial version of the code; I don't think > anyone has bothered to change it. Indeed, but that's really my point. The codebase we contributed to already began with a license and we can't just override that without some actually standing to do so. > How did the TiK developers go about changing their license? Did they > actually get any kind of approval to do so from AOL or did they just > change it assuming that AOL would never bother to come after them? It would be interested to hear how they handled the situation, we might be able to just follow suit. - Jim |
From: NeilFred P. <nei...@gm...> - 2010-02-19 20:00:44
|
Of all the developers who have contributed to TNT since the SourceForge project was created, I suspect that nobody would have any problem at all with changing the license to be more free. The license text that's in there is probably just whatever AOL put in when they originally released the initial version of the code; I don't think anyone has bothered to change it. How did the TiK developers go about changing their license? Did they actually get any kind of approval to do so from AOL or did they just change it assuming that AOL would never bother to come after them? -- NeilFred Picciotto On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ul...@ge...> wrote: > Hi, > > I hope this list is still alive. I'm maintainer of Emacs related > packages in Gentoo. Recently it was pointed out to me that TNT is > released under a non-free license. > > The following old thread (it's about TiK, but the TNT license has the > same terms) summarises the issue nicely: > <http://www.mail-archive.com/deb...@li.../msg04343.html> > > | The TiK license looks a lot like the standard BSD / XFree86 > | non-Copyleft Free Software license, except for two minor issues. > | First, clause ii) places a restriction on how the software can be > | used. Second, another section near the end makes some additional > | prohibitions on use by saying the software can not be used to > | operate a nuclear facility or for aircraft control, air traffic, > | aircraft navigation or aircraft communications. While this section > | is of little consequence to anyone because it is probably impossible > | for someone to use TiK for any of these purposes, this restriction > | violates our guideline #6 (No Discrimination Against Fields of > | Endeavor) and may prevent us from distributing the software. > > Now TiK was relicensed under the GNU GPL long time ago. Therefore I'd > like to ask if the same could be done for TNT? > > Also, the SF project page <http://sourceforge.net/projects/tnt/> > wrongly labels the package as "License: OSI-Approved Open Source". > At least that should be changed. > > Ulrich > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > tnt-devel mailing list > tnt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tnt-devel > |
From: Jim W. II <jnw...@gm...> - 2010-02-19 11:55:26
|
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ul...@ge...> wrote: > Hi, > > I hope this list is still alive. I'm maintainer of Emacs related > packages in Gentoo. Recently it was pointed out to me that TNT is > released under a non-free license. > > The following old thread (it's about TiK, but the TNT license has the > same terms) summarises the issue nicely: > <http://www.mail-archive.com/deb...@li.../msg04343.html> > > | The TiK license looks a lot like the standard BSD / XFree86 > | non-Copyleft Free Software license, except for two minor issues. > | First, clause ii) places a restriction on how the software can be > | used. Second, another section near the end makes some additional > | prohibitions on use by saying the software can not be used to > | operate a nuclear facility or for aircraft control, air traffic, > | aircraft navigation or aircraft communications. While this section > | is of little consequence to anyone because it is probably impossible > | for someone to use TiK for any of these purposes, this restriction > | violates our guideline #6 (No Discrimination Against Fields of > | Endeavor) and may prevent us from distributing the software. > > Now TiK was relicensed under the GNU GPL long time ago. Therefore I'd > like to ask if the same could be done for TNT? > > Also, the SF project page <http://sourceforge.net/projects/tnt/> > wrongly labels the package as "License: OSI-Approved Open Source". > At least that should be changed. Unfortunately, the license isn't something that we are able to change. We didn't set the license, and the original code was released by AOL and they retain the copyright for that original work. We thus cannot relicense their work without their explicit permission and we had enough difficulty finding the code in the first place. I've updated the sourceforge page to reflect 'Other license', per your suggestion. - Jim |
From: Ulrich M. <ul...@ge...> - 2010-02-19 11:50:27
|
Hi, I hope this list is still alive. I'm maintainer of Emacs related packages in Gentoo. Recently it was pointed out to me that TNT is released under a non-free license. The following old thread (it's about TiK, but the TNT license has the same terms) summarises the issue nicely: <http://www.mail-archive.com/deb...@li.../msg04343.html> | The TiK license looks a lot like the standard BSD / XFree86 | non-Copyleft Free Software license, except for two minor issues. | First, clause ii) places a restriction on how the software can be | used. Second, another section near the end makes some additional | prohibitions on use by saying the software can not be used to | operate a nuclear facility or for aircraft control, air traffic, | aircraft navigation or aircraft communications. While this section | is of little consequence to anyone because it is probably impossible | for someone to use TiK for any of these purposes, this restriction | violates our guideline #6 (No Discrimination Against Fields of | Endeavor) and may prevent us from distributing the software. Now TiK was relicensed under the GNU GPL long time ago. Therefore I'd like to ask if the same could be done for TNT? Also, the SF project page <http://sourceforge.net/projects/tnt/> wrongly labels the package as "License: OSI-Approved Open Source". At least that should be changed. Ulrich |
From: Jim W. II <jnw...@gm...> - 2009-10-31 09:49:29
|
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Timothy Beyer <be...@cs...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am having trouble getting UTF-8 to work with TNT (both send and receive from other clients, being Pidgin and Bitlbee). I have sucessfully used UTF-8 Kanji characters inside erc via bitlbee, (with Pidgin as the other client) using jabber and oscar protocol, so I'm wondering if this is just a limitation of the TOC 2.x protocol, or TNT, or am I missing something? There is some talk on the Miranda IM forums of "TOC 3" (http://forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?p=29010) protocol, but I'm not sure if that person just made a typo. > > I haven't looked at the TNT code in quite a long time, but I could try to implement support for UTF 8, assuming it's supported by the protocol. I'm using version TNT 2.6. There hasn't been all that much work on TNT in the past few years, full stop. There's likely better ways to handle things now, but I'm not sure how many of the "developers" are still actively using it. That being said, I'm happy to hand the keys to the sourceforge project over to someone who has more of a stake in the software. - Jim |
From: Timothy B. <be...@cs...> - 2009-10-31 06:38:39
|
Hi, I am having trouble getting UTF-8 to work with TNT (both send and receive from other clients, being Pidgin and Bitlbee). I have sucessfully used UTF-8 Kanji characters inside erc via bitlbee, (with Pidgin as the other client) using jabber and oscar protocol, so I'm wondering if this is just a limitation of the TOC 2.x protocol, or TNT, or am I missing something? There is some talk on the Miranda IM forums of "TOC 3" (http://forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?p=29010) protocol, but I'm not sure if that person just made a typo. I haven't looked at the TNT code in quite a long time, but I could try to implement support for UTF 8, assuming it's supported by the protocol. I'm using version TNT 2.6. Thanks! Tim |
From: David L. <lon...@gm...> - 2009-08-28 02:02:32
|
Hi, In my efforts to do everything I ever do inside of emacs, I'm trying to get TNT working. So far, I've unpacked the 2.6 tarball to my site-lisp, and set up the ~/.emacs config for it. The problem I'm having is this: After I put in my password, it attempts to connect, but never does. From the message buffer: 21:54:59 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set 21:55:29 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set 21:55:59 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set 21:56:29 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set 21:56:59 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set 21:57:29 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set 21:58:00 TNT connection closed, trying to reconnect... Attempting to sign on... Mark set And so on. Any ideas what's wrong, or how to get a more useful debug output? Thanks, Dave |
From: Rafidi <dic...@ic...> - 2009-08-20 19:25:48
|
Up for the fowls to roost on. These should be placed one above another at the corner, and so disposed, that one range of birds does not sit quite under the other, for reasons which need not be explained. At the bottom of the fowl-house, but not under the perches, should be placed the nest boxes, from four to six, as may be required, in which straw should be placed for the hens to make their nests with. The fowl-house and everything about it should be kept scrupulously clean, and be frequently white-washed; and it is good, occasionally, to fumigate the house by burning herbs, and juniper and cedar woods. THE VARIOUS BREEDS OF FOWLS. These are very numerous, and are becoming more so every day. Among them are the following:-- THE DORKING BREED. So named from the town of Dorking in Surrey. It is one of the largest of our fowls. It is of an entire white colour, and has five claws upon each foot, _generally_, for some have not. They are good layers, and their flesh is plump. They make excellent capons. POLAND BREED. The Poland fowls are greatly esteemed, but they are seldom to be met with pure in this country. They were originally imported from Holland. Their colour is shining black, with white tufts on the head of both cock and hen, springing from a fleshy protuberance or "King David's crown," the celestial in heraldry. This breed lay a great quantity of eggs, and are sometimes called "everlasting layers." They quickly fatten, and are good eating. SPANISH BREED. The Spanish fowl, with the Hamburg and Chittagong, is a very large fowl, laying large eggs, and all see |
From: Pflugh E. <ic...@ks...> - 2009-07-30 14:11:31
|
Sex Tricks - Foor the Common Maan.www.only9. org |
From: Amadio P. <va...@ta...> - 2009-07-25 08:09:48
|
3 Mokst Effective Ways To Drive A Woman Wild -- Blow Her Over And Be Absolutely Stunning.www.45meds .net |
From: creaturehood<pol...@el...> - 2009-07-24 17:56:26
|
3 Devastating Mistakes Most Men Make in Bed - oYu Must Be Aware of These Before It's oTo Late.www.onlyviagra. net |
From: Ronin M. <inf...@dr...> - 2009-07-23 17:56:12
|
Can Pheromones Affect Turst in the Work Palce?.www.pill84(.net) |
From: Galen<inj...@sa...> - 2009-07-20 06:34:34
|
First Tdime sex - Losisng Your Virginity.www[dot]se57[dot]net |
From: Otsuka Fiebich<ba...@em...> - 2009-07-17 16:08:03
|
Amazing sex - Using sex Games To Drive Your Loveer Wmild.www[dot]pill84[dot]net |
From: inhalation<ing...@id...> - 2009-07-11 21:32:46
|
How The 'Ugly' Wife Can Keep Hcer Maan's Attention On Her.www-se57+net |
From: bitartrate <ozo...@ca...> - 2009-07-10 19:01:48
|
How to Msake a Better Lover Ohut of Your Christian Husband www.ma29. net. 'Fat Msan' finishes walking trek inn NYC |
From: sublimated<jal...@rc...> - 2009-07-06 13:26:06
|
How to Turn a Woman On - Here is the Most Impoprtant Skill No nOe Will Ever Share With You www. via99. org. Aiirline Passyenger Urinates In Air-Sickness Bag |