Re: [Tile-dev] Proposed ttk::dialog callback change

[Kevin P. <Kev...@Ap...>]

Yes, that will do nicely. Thanks for the post.

Kevin

On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 10:12 -0800, Joe English wrote:
> Kevin Partin wrote:
> 
> > Currently when the user presses a button on a ttk::dialog widget, the
> > widget is destroyed regardless of which button was invoked, and the
> > return status of the callback command.
> >
> > In terms of user feedback and interaction with the dialog widget,
> > wouldn't it be better if the command where executed before the dialog
> > widget is destroyed? The dialog widget could check the return status of
> > the command, and if it was zero, destroy the dialog. This way the
> > programmer has some control over when the dialog is destroyed.
> 
> The dialog will stay posted if the -command script returns
> a TCL_BREAK or TCL_CONTINUE return code.  Does that do
> what you want?
> 
> 
> --Joe English
> 
>   jen...@fl...
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Tktable-tile-dev mailing list
> Tkt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tktable-tile-dev
-- 
Kevin Partin
Applied Structural Dynamics, Inc.
(281) 286-8959