|
From: Eckhard L. <ec...@we...> - 2006-11-25 21:24:11
|
Jeff Hobbs schrieb: > >> Also, your intention (decision?) to exclude treeview from the core >> doesn't take into account that there are quite a few people who already >> use treeview (in spite of its relatively early development state). >> After all, this wouldn't be the first widget in the core whose early >> versions are not yet quite satisfactory. >> > > Please identify these people. Jeff, actually I am using treeview quite a lot for the Tloona IDE (www.tloona.tk) and underlying "Tmw" megawidgets (which are part of Tloona only). X scroll would be fine, but in general I am happy that it is so simple to use compared to treectrl. I would have a real problem if treeview was not included in the final version of Tk. Also I think that the real way is somewhere in between treectrl and treeview. The easy handling of treeview, together with some more of treectrl's features would be fine. But not all of treectrl's features... what I'd appreciate is the functionality of treeview plus: - putting arbitrary windows/widgets in tree columns, like in tktable and treectrl - aligning text/labels/widgets in treeview (-sticky) - have editable text in tree columns I would be very happy with that, it's all I can imagine as necessary for a tree widget in my (developer) life ;-). Eckhard |