|
From: Jeff H. <je...@ac...> - 2006-10-02 05:23:58
|
Joe English wrote: > > > [ttk::progressbar] will become [ttk::progress] too. > Main reason for the name change is that it's not > always a bar -- different styles can support different=20 > appearances (OSX-style "chasing arrows", browser-style=20 > "download in progress" throbbers, a "copying file" animation,=20 > ...). It might end up as two widgets, a general-purpose=20 > ttk::progress widget and a specialized ttk::progressbar ... Hmmm, I would have expected progressbar as well, but your point does = make sense. The problem is that 'progress' is so ... half-sensical from the = widget naming perspective. I'm not sure that progressbar isn't still more appropriate, as throbbers and chasing arrows are "bar-like". > There might be a [ttk::toplevel] in a future release, > but the implementation will involve more changes > than just embedding a ttk::frame in the background. Note that Ttk is likely to hit the 8.5 codebase (finally :/ ) between = 0.7.8 and 0.8.0. It will free up some restrictions in code sharing (full Tk = core internals access) and may make something things like this easier. Jeff |